jakebe: (Mythology)
Want to know something really great? Read the Wikipedia entry on Ujamaa here. Julius Nyerere developed a political and economic blueprint for lifting Tanzania out of poverty back in the 60s. The idea was to remove barriers and dividing lines between the people within Tanzania and replacing them with incentives to fostering a national identity with a focus on shared wealth and community. It didn't quite work -- mostly due to circumstances beyond Nyerere's control -- but it was a noble experiment that the hip-hop scene in Tanzania is trying to bring back.
Here in the United States and Western parts of the African diaspora, Ujamaa is the principle we focus on today, the fourth day of Kwanzaa. While it doesn't quite go as far as promoting the African socialism of Tanzania, it does encourage the idea of cooperative economics; this builds on the concept of Ujima quite well, turning the social idea into a financial blueprint. We are meant to build and maintain our own stores, shops and businesses, and profit from them together. In black America, we go into businesses that serve our people and community, and small (or large) business owners use that generated wealth for the good of the neighborhoods they're in.
This could mean shopping at the local corner store when you can instead of heading to a convenience store chain like 7-Eleven; it could mean choosing hair and skin care products made for us, buy us; it could mean supporting black artists and creative people by buying and promoting the work that offers us reflections of our culture that are more nuanced, positive and engaging. Ujamaa is an immensely broad concept, and one of the great things about it is there are so many different ways to practice it.
One of the great joys for me this year was the discovery of the small business online and the popularization of sites like Kickstarter, GoFundMe and Patreon. It was a great way for small businesses and artists to make their pitches directly to their customers, and for the customers to respond in kind with a financial statement. Each donation or pledge told these people that we believe in them and their work, and we would like to see it come to fruition. In gaming and fandom circles, there are now artists who can do what they do full-time because they now have a mechanism that allows them to be supported by an appreciative and engaged audience. For me, these sites are a wonderful way to bring Ujamaa into the 21st century.
It also means encouraging responsible use of the wealth we create. One of the big difficulties in impoverished communities in general is the understanding of how to use money wisely. I'm not talking about poor people buying televisions or tennis shoes; I'm talking about finding ways to make what little money we have work harder for us. When a financial windfall comes, we're often faced with the choice of getting ahead on bills (which really sucks all the joy out of having unexpected money) or doing something fun with it. All too often, there's a sense that the game is rigged and any effort taken to get ahead will ultimately be wasted. And to be sure, there are all kinds of ways the poor are unfairly taxed in this country. But come on -- black people in this country have had to maintain ourselves during slavery, segregation and Jim Crow, and the continuing structural discrimination that makes it so hard for us to get a leg up in this world. With time, patience, effort and intelligence, we can beat that too.
This year, I vow to continue what I've started in 2015 -- to seek out, promote and shop at minority-owned and -operated businesses. Because I'm such a geek, it's been a genuine pleasure to find creators of color whose works I'm totally down with. Are you aware of The Pack, a graphic novel about African werewolves? Or the many, many, MANY sci-fi/fantasy writers of color out there? I'll talk a bit about these folks in a couple of days, but if nothing else 2015 has really opened my eyes about what minorities are doing in genre spaces and just how exciting it is.
I'll also do my best to be smarter about managing/eliminating my debt this year, and making sure that my money is going places that help me, my family, my community and my people. I'm very fortunate to be in the financial situation I'm in, and I could be doing better things with it. I'll be devoting time and energy to figuring out how.
As always, Ujamaa doesn't JUST have to be focused on the African diaspora. We all belong to communities, close and online, that could use a bit of care. How are we using our money wisely? How are we promoting good in our lives through our dollars?
Have a solid Kwanzaa today, everyone. I'll check in with you tomorrow.
jakebe: (Hugs!)
This week, FurAffinity decided that it would update its advertising policy to include "mature" ads on pages that included mature/adult work. It didn't take very long for the backlash to come, which is pretty much what happens whenever FA tries something new. More users and artists distanced themselves from the site -- if they didn't leave outright -- and more than a few furries tweeted their displeasure. As of Monday evening (when I'm writing this; I know that the story will have progressed quite a bit by the time it's posted), they've rolled things back to retool the mechanism that serves ads, but I'm not sure they're going to ever get the community on board with hard-core porn banners with explicit language.
One of the most fascinating things to me about websites these days is that there still isn't a better way for them to make money with their content than ad revenue. And while I have all the sympathy in the world for an Internet company struggling to figure out how to make their site profitable, I also have less-than-zero interest in being served a bunch of advertisements for crap that I don't need to buy. Especially when those ads include flashing, sounds, motion or whatever other mechanism they can conceive of to get to pay attention to them instead of the reason I'm on the page.
FurAffinity (and IMVU) is going to be in trouble if they're going to be more aggressive with ads in the future. It's just proving what most of the community thought about FA being acquired in the first place; that the site is being taken out of the hands of the community and put into the control of outside interests that see us more as commodities than anything. Of course, IMVU needs to find a way to keep the lights on for FA, so to speak -- they're in the business to make money, and at the very least FurAffinity needs to pay for its own operation. I get that. But a website that relies on advertising revenue, in my experience, compromises the value of its content by making that content increasingly painful to get to through the thicket of revenue-generating stuff. I know this is a slippery slope argument, but I could easily see FA becoming more trouble than it's worth to navigate, stuffed with annoying (at best) or virus-laden (at worst) ads that make it impossible to have a good time looking at community-created adult material.
But here's the thing that us folks who like browsing websites has to keep in mind: in our capitalist society, nothing is free. If we're not paying for the sites we browse in money, we pay for it some other way -- with the time it takes to navigate around pop-up or pop-under ads, or with the attention those ads draw from us. Sometimes, we pay for it with information we give those sites, who then turn around and give that information to third parties who, in turn, use it to target us better for advertising. It would be a good idea for us, as readers, to think about how we're paying for the sites we visit. These guys have to make their money somehow -- either through donations and charity, through a paywall, through advertising, through our personal information. Once we determine how a website charges for its services, we have to make a decision on whether or not we think that payment is fair.
Like most Internet-savvy denizens, I fortify my web-browsing experience with Flash blockers and anti-adware. I've been burned by Flash ads automatically downloading viruses to my computer and I'm not interested in taking chances with any more. If a website shows me potentially interesting and unobtrusive ads, I consider it fair payment for accessing their content. The Ad Blocker goes off. And in some cases, where I feel like I get enough value from a website and they offer me the choice, I'll just straight-up pay for access.
That's what I did with writing.com, where the advertising had brought me viruses a few times. It's for that reason I can't direct people there in good conscience, even though there are a few great writers and stories in the interactives. The interactive community is kind of the dirty sewer of the site, though, and the website operators will only get the worst kinds of businesses willing to run ads for those pages. Because of the content of those pages -- which includes eighteen different kinds of fetishy stuff -- only porn sites and disreputable places will pay to advertise there. So it's either put up with those awful ads or pay for access -- and since I like the interactives and have been going there for years now, I feel it's a better value to pay with money.
I think FA is in the same position. There are all kinds of terrible stuff in the adult sections of that site; hard vore, crushing, watersports and scat-play, Sonic fan art (just kidding, don't be mean to me Sonic fans!). I'm not sure that they'd be able to get too many sites outside of the community willing to advertise on those pages, and sites and services within the community probably wouldn't be able to pay the rates that "professional" places would.
So they're stuck in this place. If FA is going to be a furry site run by a non-furry interest with the aim of making enough money to justify its existence, it's either going to have to turn to some sort of formalized payment plan, an aggressive advertising policy, or trading our personal information. Instead of reflexively shouting down any way it tries to raise revenue, maybe we should think about what we would be willing to trade for our porn-browsing experience. Money? Ads that aren't quite so terrible? Sensitive data? Once we figure it out, let Dragoneer know. We actually have a chance to barter with the operator of the site; that's not something many audiences get. Using the opportunity to make the site better, instead of bashing it, would be a great thing.
I have a lot of sympathy for Dragoneer and the predicament he finds himself in. I'm not sure there's an easy answer to the demands of IMVU (which I assume is to make money, but might be something else to be fair). He suddenly finds himself in the middle of a fight between the demands of capitalism and a populace that really doesn't give a shit about it. Good luck getting out from between that rock and a hard place.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112 131415
16171819202122
23 24 25 26272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 06:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios