jakebe: (Dharma)
So no doubt most of you already know about the rapture that was supposed to happen today. But in case you didn't, here's the prediction in a nutshell: Harold Camping of The Family Radio Christian Network has been saying for a while now that the world will end at 6 PM local time (every local time) on Saturday, May 21st...which is today, as luck would have it. The big earthquake signalling the end times was to occur about two hours ago, and it hasn't yet. As far as I know, no one's been stolen up to heavenly glory. It's a normal night in late spring -- gorgeous, temperate, not a cloud in the sky.

I've made my fair share of rapture jokes this week, but instead of feeling smug about the fact that this man's obnoxious prediction failed ("The Bible guarantees it!"), I feel sorry for all of his followers. These were people who believed they were doing the right thing, and in some cases gave up all of their money, their homes and jobs to preach the gospel of this false prophet. I can only imagine them, sitting in front of their televisions or clustered together in prayer groups, looking around and wondering what the hell happened.

They've literally made no preparation for this moment. A lot of them have nothing now -- they've spent everything to get as many people saved as possible and now it turns out no one needed saving. They're not going on to a heavenly reward. The sun is setting, and it will rise tomorrow, and the world will go on.

Of course, I might be romanticizing this a bit much. I might be giving all of Camping's followers more altruistic motives than they deserve. Aren't a lot of evangelicals some of the snottiest people ever? Don't they have this superiority complex that just makes you want to scream? How can someone look down their noses at you while they profess to be saving your soul?

It's really tempting to throw this latest failure back into the faces of the believers. I totally get it. And it's even more tempting to use this as a springboard to talk about how silly the idea of Rapture is in the first place, and maybe even the entire Christian religion. Here, here is incontrovertible proof that what Camping and his followers have been saying for months now is wrong, and they've been wasting their time and breath and money for nothing.

Not to sound sanctimonious and self-righteous, but while it's really tempting, it's also wrong. I think the best thing that can come out of this is a nudge towards skepticism, logical thinking, and reasoning. You're not going to do that by being antagonistic. No one's ever won an opponent over to their side by saying "You're stupid, and here are the 112 reasons why."

I think more than anything it's important to sympathize with someone you see as absolutely wrong. One of the reasons Christians have such a horrible reputation because they don't do this, and us heathenous masses don't have much luck with them because we react so poorly (but understandably so!) to that. Now's a chance, while they're not shouting, to speak in a measured tone. Through words and actions.

I don't personally know one of Camping's followers. Despite the fact that he's based nearby in Oakland, the presence of his congregation has been confined to his billboards. But I've been reading that there are some Christian groups out there waiting by the headquarters of Family Christian Radio ready to counsel those people who've given up so much for this thing, who are at risk of depression because of this faith-shattering event. It's really touching, actually. It's caring. It's compassionate. It's Christ-like.

A lot of us have been saying all along that we're better than most Christians. Well, think of this as a chance to prove it. Instead of kicking someone while they're down, help them back up, pick up the pieces and maybe help teach them how not to be in this position again.

That's what I'd want someone to do for me.
jakebe: (Confusion)
There's a scene in Six Feet Under's fourth season that's alternately thrilling and terrifying. George, Ruth's new husband, is having this dream where he's asleep and there's this bright, blinding flash outside of his window. They're woken up as the outside wall buckles in. George goes downstairs to see what's going on, and the house is devastated. Car alarms are going off, the air raid sirens are sounding far too late to warn people about what's going on, and there's a woman standing in the ruins of Ruth's kitchen. "What have you done?" he asks her. Before she can answer, Ruth's shaking him awake. You were whimpering and paddling your feet, she tells him.

The scene is terrifying to me because it lays bare one of my most basic fears, that of nuclear annihilation. It's thrilling because it does this so perfectly. It was like finding a local chapter of Apocaholics Anonymous or something. Somebody gets me, I'm thinking. I'm not alone.

I grew up in the 1980s, with Reagan and Gorbachev and their 1200 nuclear warheads pointed at each other. This was the decade that brought us Threads and The Day After, When the Wind Blows and The Fate of the Earth and War Day. All of the dystopian sci-fi had ravaged antagonists wandering a broken US, scavenging the nuclear wasteland for whatever materials were left. Looking back, it felt like we were just waking up from our naivete about this stuff in the 1950s. If there were a war, even a limited one, the world would not recover for hundreds of years. Our ideas were beaten into shape by alarmists and environmentalists and politicians. Mutually assured destruction. Enough warheads to kill every man, woman and child 12 times over. We finally had the power to crack the world in half. Nuclear annihilation was as much a part of the eighties for me as Twisted Sister, neon-colored accessories and greedy Wall Street executives.

This idea, this perverse fascination with our destruction, isn't something that you shake very easily. When I was a kid it manifested itself as a fervent belief that I would see Armageddon and a resulting devoutness to my parent's religion. Now, it manifests itself with a limitless thirst for apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction. And, occasionally, the desire to stock up on bottled water and canned food. Just in case. But now, with Ryan seeing how poor Ruth had to watch her George fall apart under the weight of an imagined holocaust right before her eyes, I think I'll never be able to express a desire for a preparedness kit again. :)

These days I tell myself that my love of post-apocalyptic (dubbed "PA" by the good folks over at the Quiet Earth website) stuff is all due to the way you can use it as an extreme setting to explore the depths of human strengths and weaknesses. Cormac McCarthy's The Road is a very touching meditation on the impossible strength of love between a father and a son. Lucifer's Hammer is an interesting thought on how it's possible to structure a better, more rational civilization on the rubble of an old one. It's lovely and stirring and inspiring to read about these people who have retreated to their purest selves, whether that's depraved sickos or the leaders of a new and freer world. That's what I tell myself. Deep down I know, though, that I'm still the little kid who freaks out at the weekly air raid siren test. That, for better or for worse, that my fascination with the end of the world is a strange kind of nostalgia, a bridge I use to join the gap between today and yesterday.

I can't be alone here, with the strange nostalgia trigger, so I thought I would ask you folks this: What's the oddest thing you can think of that reminds you of your childhood? And what's your favorite apocalyptic or post-apocalyptic story? It can be a book, comic, television show or movie. I'm genuinely interested -- I could always use a new story for the next time I go on a PA bender.
jakebe: (Poetry)


Just in case you didn't want to get to sleep tonight. The music is just about perfect for the video, though there's also a Benny Hill version that's pretty damned good too. :D I found this floating around in a few friend's pages, and I thought it was too terrifying not to share.

Oddly enough, most of the people I've talked to about this simply seem to shrug. "We all have to die sometime." This is true, but there's a world of difference between dying peacefully in your sleep and being vaporized by a cataclysmic event that takes all life on earth with it. It's OK to pee your pants about this one.

Anyway, I've started reading East of Eden by John Steinbeck for my English composition class, and I'm really enjoying it so far. This is the first book I've read with a pen, making annotations in the margins, circling words I don't know, highlighting passages that I really love. I see why people make a habit of it now. :)

The novel follows two families: the Hamiltons, a huge, poor but lively clan, and the Trasks, a small, tragic, wealthy group. The Trasks, in chapter three, re-enact the story of Cain and Abel in such a fascinating way. From the very first page the novel rings with the dichotomy of the beloved and the rejected, and all the reasons people decide to give their love to this one and not that one, the ways in which they do it, the consequences of their actions. It's really fascinating.

I'm really digging English comp in general, by the way. We've done a few little piddly writing exercises, but nothing worth showing here. I only hope by the end of the class I can string sentences together a bit better than I do now.
jakebe: (Default)
Weight: 164.4 lbs.
Time: 35 minutes
Distance: 3.21 miles
Speed: 6.5 mph
Calories: 331

I goosed my speed up to 6.5 mph for five minutes, just to see if I could handle it. It was a good stretch, and I handled it just fine. I could definitely do with drinking more water, though. Almost made three and a quarter miles this time around, though I think I might tone it back for my runs on Wednesday and Friday.

Today I'm grateful for all of the comforts I have. Ryan and I were watching 28 Weeks Later this afternoon and I couldn't help thinking what it would be like for society to...just stop working, for whatever reason. What if we can't find a way around Peak Oil? What if a supervolcano erupts? What if we get hit with a really big earthquake, even?

Part of this comes from The Mist as well, which explores what happens to people when we lose the sense of order we've placed on the world around us. We get scared when the things we've come to expect stop happening, or our lives stop making sense in the way we'd like it to. Disliking the rain comes from an expectation to be dry. Disliking the Apocalypse comes from the expectation for the way things are to continue at least until we die.

Could we ever truly be mentally prepared for a sudden and irreversible change in our way of life? Could we roll with it if there were suddenly no electricity or cars, no job to go to and bitch about? How crazy would we get in our search for some reason, some way to fill the vacuum such a loss would create? It's just something to think about.

In the meantime, I have a fairly hot shower to get to.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13 14 1516171819
20 21 2223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 12th, 2025 12:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios